Get clarity in seconds
NO GUESSWORKUpload Photo
One shot. Face optional. Private by default.
Get Your %
Estimated range informed by research.
Start Your Plan
Custom bulk/cut strategy. Track weekly progress.
Alternative methods (if you can't upload a photo)
While AI photo analysis offers the most detailed insights under consistent conditions, we also offer traditional methods backed by military and medical research.
Most detailed insights and unlocks a tailored Bulk/Cut plan. Kept private to your account.
- Good lighting, neutral stance
- Face optional (you can blur or cover it)
Research note: Many adults aim for WHtR < 0.5. See NICE guidelines.
Photo (AI)
RecommendedBest overall for speed vs precision when lighting/pose are controlled. Great for weekly progress and remote coaching.
Navy (Tape)
No photoNeck/waist (+/- hips) circumference method. Provides a solid cross-check if you can't upload a photo.
Quick: WHtR/BMI
FastestOne-minute baseline. Use WHtR to gauge central adiposity and decide if bulking or cutting makes sense, then move to Photo.
Still guessing if you should bulk or cut?
Join thousands of lifters who stopped wasting time and started seeing results.
Benchmarked in studies vs DEXA (see research)
Fast analysis with actionable insights
Zero commitment — no long‑term contracts
What you get
Fast Analysis
Typically under a minute
Complete Privacy
Face optional, not shared publicly
Actionable Plan
Custom bulk/cut strategy
Research‑informed
References to related methods
FAQs
Which method is most accurate?
DEXA is a common reference in research. For frequent tracking, use one method under consistent conditions. Photo- and circumference-based methods can align with reference measures on average but have individual error; we show a range and recommend cross-checks.
How often should I measure?
Use lab-grade scans (e.g., DEXA) for occasional baselines. Between those checkpoints, stick to a weekly or biweekly method (Quick, Tape, or Photo) done the same way each time to watch trends.
What affects accuracy?
Hydration, time of day, food, training, lighting/pose (for photos), and tape placement. Measure at a consistent time and use averaged readings.
Is photo good enough?
For trend tracking and planning, photo estimation is fast and practical—especially with consistent lighting and stance. For a clinical baseline, use DEXA.
Is waist-to-height ratio better than BMI?
Waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) can reflect central adiposity and risk better than BMI in many groups. A common target is WHtR < 0.5. Use WHtR alongside BMI and photos for a fuller picture.
How accurate is the Navy body fat calculator?
The U.S. Navy circumference method is standardized and practical; accuracy depends on consistent tape landmarks and technique. Take two readings, average them, and track trends over time.
How accurate is an AI body fat calculator?
AI photo estimates can align with reference methods in controlled settings, but lighting, pose, and clothing matter. Treat it as one input; cross-check with WHtR or tape.
This page is educational and not medical advice.
References & guidance
Related research and official guidance on common body composition methods.
- AI photo analysis and DXA study — npj Digital Medicine (Nature, 2025)
Study in controlled settings on photo estimates vs DXA
- U.S. Navy Body Composition Protocol — Military fitness standard (2025)
Official circumference method guidance
- Smartphone Camera Validation Study — NIH/PubMed Central (2022)
Mobile photo analysis studied against clinical measures